It's reported in the
Times and
Daily Telegraph (and now elsewhere) that, in an Urdu-language broadcast in his native Pakistan, British Muslim life peer
Lord Ahmed has blamed his 12-week prison sentence (he was freed after serving 16 days) in 2008 for a fatal driving offence in 2007 on da Joos:
“My case became more critical because I went to Gaza to support Palestinians. My Jewish friends who own newspapers and TV channels opposed this.”
As a result of this alleged statement he's been suspended from the Labour Party:
"The Labour Party deplores and does not tolerate any sort of racism or anti-Semitism...we are suspending Lord Ahmed pending an investigation."
Read the
Telegraph report
here
I have seen a picture of this creep and read about his antics - and this guy is a "peer"? In "the House of Lords"?? Wasn't there a time when the English had a little more class? (Although, the way they behaved towards the Jewish people after WWII makes me wonder when that (the having a little more class) might have been.
ReplyDeleteWell, well, well!
ReplyDeletehttp://cifwatch.com/2013/03/14/the-antisemitic-reflex-a-jew-baiting-tweet-by-the-guardians-michael-white/
Ahmed was a PC appointment by the Labour party, and he is what you get when you lower the bar as low as it can go.
ReplyDeleteHe was driving from Dewsbury in West Yorkshire to his home in Rotherham South Yorkshire via the M1 motorway on Christmas day 2007 in his Jaguar.
His car ran into another that had previously been in an accident killing the other driver. When his mobile phone was forensically examined it was found that he had been making calls and sending texts all of this 60 min's journey.
He was lucky that he was only charged with careless driving and not causing death by dangerous driving, a charge with a much greater prison sentence. I understand the other driver is still dead.
Ahmed has form, he threatened a 100,000 MAN( no ladies ) march on the house of lords if they dare show the film Fitna, and performed when Salman Rushdie was knighted.
It makes you wonder what else is said about the Jews when he thinks he is out of earshot in Pakistan or his local mosque.
Tony Blair has much to answer for!
DeleteBut the court noted that he had last texted 2 minutes before the crash, and they could find no causal between the texting and the crash. If they had, he's have been charged with causing death by dangerous driving. Which carries penalties measured in years.
ReplyDeleteIn other words, they know he did it, but the evidence wasn't there. And if we are to have the rule of law, the evidence must rule.
What's really wrong in this story is the tale he told on Pakistani television as to how is all the Jews fault. The story was broken by The Times of London, which has an honourable record in fighting antisemitism. It's their article which are heavily quoted on engage and linked to elsewhere.
This story can also be followed (with comments) on engageonline.wordpress.com; simplyjews.blogspot.com; anne's opinions at http://anneinpt.wordpress.com/ among others
The M1 in south yorkshire where the collision took place is long and straight. The prosecution could prove the phone had been used for the full 60 minutes of the journey. What it couldn't do was prove that he was actually sending a text at the point of impact, but I bet he was in the process of composing a text and his eyes were on the phone and not the road. Why else would he ram into a stationary car on such a road.
DeleteThanks, Brian and Steve.
ReplyDelete