3 great articles countering the current libellous campaign by the Defence for Children International – Palestine/PFLP
Guardian Report Misses the Real Child Abuse http://honestreporting.com/guardian-report-misses-the-real-child-abuse/
The Guardian and the Australian Use Suspect Sources in Israel Child Abuse Story http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/01/26/the-guardian-and-the-australian-use-suspect-sources-in-israel-child-abuse-story/
Political Activism as Journalism: Harriet Sherwood promotes agenda of radical anti-Israel NGO http://cifwatch.com/2012/01/24/political-activism-as-journalism-harriet-sherwood-promotes-agenda-of-radical-anti-israel-ngo/
Very interesting "Israel is obliged under international law to apply to the West Bank the legal system that was in place before it became occupied in 1967,"
In a weird coincidence I was arguing with some online about a month ago, who sent me this, thinking it was about Hague article 42 (he wasn’t very bright just spamming stuff he didn’t read or understand). I remembered it because I had a good laugh at his blunder. LEGISLATION UNDER ARTICLE 43 OF THE HAGUE REGULATIONS: BELLIGERENT OCCUPATION AND PEACEBUILDING BY PROFESSOR YORAM DINSTEIN http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/OccasionalPaper1.pdf The paper talks about the conflict between the requirements of Hague Article 43, Geneva IV Article. 47 and 64. Considering Jordan effectively banned Jews from all of its territory I don’t see how Israel could apply their laws. Also following Jordanian law would legitimise their annexation of the west bank. They could go back to British Mandate Laws, which would really give people something to complain about.
I agree with Eugene Rostow, the WB is unclaimed mandate territory. Its current status is disputed territory, administered under the Oslo accords, where Israel applies its own laws to Area C.
3 great articles countering the current libellous campaign by the Defence for Children International – Palestine/PFLP
ReplyDeleteGuardian Report Misses the Real Child Abuse
http://honestreporting.com/guardian-report-misses-the-real-child-abuse/
The Guardian and the Australian Use Suspect Sources in Israel Child Abuse Story
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/01/26/the-guardian-and-the-australian-use-suspect-sources-in-israel-child-abuse-story/
Political Activism as Journalism: Harriet Sherwood promotes agenda of radical anti-Israel NGO
http://cifwatch.com/2012/01/24/political-activism-as-journalism-harriet-sherwood-promotes-agenda-of-radical-anti-israel-ngo/
Ian
Thanks, Ian!
ReplyDeleteThanks Ian
ReplyDeleteVery interesting "Israel is obliged under international law to apply to the West Bank the legal system that was in place before it became occupied in 1967,"
http://www.aijac.org.au/news/article/don-t-throw-stones
In a weird coincidence I was arguing with some online about a month ago, who sent me this, thinking it was about Hague article 42 (he wasn’t very bright just spamming stuff he didn’t read or understand). I remembered it because I had a good laugh at his blunder.
DeleteLEGISLATION UNDER ARTICLE 43 OF THE HAGUE REGULATIONS: BELLIGERENT OCCUPATION AND PEACEBUILDING BY PROFESSOR YORAM DINSTEIN
http://www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/OccasionalPaper1.pdf
The paper talks about the conflict between the requirements of Hague Article 43, Geneva IV Article. 47 and 64.
Considering Jordan effectively banned Jews from all of its territory I don’t see how Israel could apply their laws. Also following Jordanian law would legitimise their annexation of the west bank. They could go back to British Mandate Laws, which would really give people something to complain about.
I agree with Eugene Rostow, the WB is unclaimed mandate territory. Its current status is disputed territory, administered under the Oslo accords, where Israel applies its own laws to Area C.
Ian